Radar OSS · Cluster Audit

31 best-practice checks. Zero install on your cluster.

Security, reliability, and efficiency checks - inspired by Polaris, Kubescape, Trivy, and the NSA/CISA hardening guide. Runs against Radar's cached cluster state, finishes in under a second.

Apache 2.0 · Runs on your laptop or in-cluster · No account needed
radar · cluster audit
Radar cluster audit showing security, reliability, and efficiency findings with per-check remediation and framework labels
The problem

Three tools, one ops fight, and a cluster you still can't sign off on.

You want the CIS hardening advice. You install Kubescape. You want the reliability and efficiency best-practices. You install Polaris. You want any of it enforced. You add Kyverno. Three tools, three CRD sets, three maintenance surfaces.

And your first output is a YAML report you have to diff against last week's to know if anything got worse.

Radar's audit runs 31 checks spanning all three concerns - security, reliability, efficiency - grouped into one view, with per-check remediation, labeled by which framework originated it(NSA/CISA, CIS, Polaris). No operator to deploy. No CRDs installed. No scan schedule to maintain. The audit runs against Radar's already-cached cluster state, so it finishes in under a second.

What gets checked

Three categories. 31 checks. Zero config.

Inspired by Polaris, Kubescape, Trivy, and the NSA/CISA Kubernetes hardening guide. Categories from the Radar README; example checks below are representative.

Security

  • Privileged containers
  • Privilege escalation allowed
  • Host namespaces shared (hostPID, hostIPC, hostNetwork)
  • Container runtime sockets mounted
  • Service account tokens auto-mounted

Reliability

  • Liveness / readiness probes missing
  • Image tagged `:latest`
  • Single-replica Deployments (no HA)
  • HA risk (all replicas on one node)
  • Deprecated APIs still in use

Efficiency

  • Resource requests missing
  • Resource limits missing
  • Orphan ConfigMaps / Secrets
  • Overprovisioned limits

Examples above are from the Radar README. The running audit enumerates all 31 with per-finding remediation guidance.

Under the hood

Why the audit is fast.

01

Runs on cached state

Radar's informer cache already powers the topology and resource views. The audit re-uses it. No extra API calls, no cluster-side scan scheduler.

02

Framework-labeled findings

Each finding carries labels for the framework it came from - NSA/CISA, CIS, Polaris - so you can filter to the one your auditor cares about or the set your compliance program requires.

03

Ignore lists

Configurable per-namespace ignore rules for the controllers you already know break the checks on purpose (kube-system, GPU operators, etc.) - so real findings aren't buried by noise.

Compared to the stack you'd otherwise assemble

One install instead of three operators.

What you wantTypical toolRadar audit
Security best-practices (NSA/CISA, CIS)Kubescape operator + KyvernoBuilt-in, labeled
Reliability hygiene (probes, replicas, :latest)Polaris operatorBuilt-in
Efficiency checks (requests/limits, orphans)Polaris operator or custom kubectl scriptsBuilt-in
Per-check remediation guidanceTool-dependentIn every finding
Install cost3 operators + 3 CRD setsbrew install
Scan latencyScheduled CronJob, minutesSub-second, on demand
Container CVE scanningTrivyOut of scope - pair with Trivy
Open source

Apache 2.0. Yours to inspect, fork, or self-host.

Radar's source is on GitHub. Every feature on this page is in the binary you install with brew install. No telemetry, no mandatory login, no cluster data out. The one outbound call is an anonymous version check when the UI opens. If we ever change that, you'll see it in a diff first.

skyhook-io/radar
2.6k★ GitHub stars
Apache 2.0 · Actively maintained
When you're auditing more than one cluster

Radar Cloud runs the audit across your whole fleet.

Same 31 checks. Same framework labels. Fleet-wide rollup across connected clusters, so you can see which checks are failing where without opening each cluster separately.

See the OSS vs Cloud comparison
FAQ

Questions we get about cluster audit.

What frameworks are the 31 checks based on?
The checks draw on Polaris, Kubescape, Trivy, the NSA/CISA Kubernetes hardening guide, and CIS benchmarks. Findings carry labels for NSA/CISA, CIS, and Polaris specifically, so you can filter to the one your auditor cares about.
Do I need to install an operator or CRDs to run the audit?
No. The audit runs against Radar's already-cached cluster state - the same informer cache that powers topology and resource views - so there's no separate operator, CRD set, or scan scheduler to deploy.
Can I ignore known or expected violations?
Yes. Configurable per-namespace ignore rules let you exclude controllers you already know break the checks on purpose (kube-system, GPU operators, and similar), so real findings aren't buried in noise.
How long does a scan take?
Sub-second, on demand - because it reuses cached cluster state instead of running a scheduled CronJob scan that takes minutes.
Can I run the audit across multiple clusters at once?
OSS runs one cluster at a time, wherever you point it. Radar Cloud adds a fleet-wide rollup - the same 31 checks and framework labels across every connected cluster, so you can see what's failing where without opening each one separately.

One binary. 31 checks. No operators.

Radar runs the checks the moment it connects. brew install, open the Audit tab, read the list.

Apache 2.0 OSS · Unlimited clusters self-hosted · Hosted free tier for up to 3 clusters